tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post1214563227489614941..comments2023-08-27T06:53:36.768-06:00Comments on LANL: The Rest of the Story: Comment of the WeekFrank Younghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02134775226991383924noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-14062482570371113852007-10-10T18:30:00.000-06:002007-10-10T18:30:00.000-06:00If what 6:49 AM and 7:24 AM are implying is true, ...If what 6:49 AM and 7:24 AM are implying is true, how can their comments be viewed as petty and vindictive? In the age of pending RIFs and accountability, it sounds to me like someone from S-6 should be notified.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-72113298632896025972007-10-10T07:50:00.000-06:002007-10-10T07:50:00.000-06:00How petty and vindictive people can some of you pe...How petty and vindictive people can some of you people be? How sad!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-5447881948623257252007-10-10T07:24:00.000-06:002007-10-10T07:24:00.000-06:00Not escortable gray badges are just fine, as long ...Not escortable gray badges are just fine, as long as you don't make that person a GL or anything.<BR/><BR/>Wait, what? Did that happen?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-26812177292905739512007-10-10T06:49:00.000-06:002007-10-10T06:49:00.000-06:00Nothing screams out leadership like a "Not Escorta...Nothing screams out leadership like a "Not Escortable" gray badge. <BR/><BR/>Only in Chemistry Division...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-41952683575257904282007-10-09T23:20:00.000-06:002007-10-09T23:20:00.000-06:00Come on, 10:47, Gordon is not a drunkard, he is a ...Come on, 10:47, Gordon is not a drunkard, he is a well-respected scientific leader and line manager in C-Division. You just sound like someone who is not a chemist and who is trying to bad-mouth the great chemists at the lab. Go troll somewhere else ... buh-bye!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-21984073499199111872007-10-09T22:02:00.000-06:002007-10-09T22:02:00.000-06:00If by "prominent and visible" you mean foulmouthed...If by "prominent and visible" you mean foulmouthed and lews, I might grant you one of the above.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-12066954310982684512007-10-09T21:15:00.000-06:002007-10-09T21:15:00.000-06:00OMG! You are too precious. Wait - are you just tro...OMG! You are too precious. <BR/><BR/>Wait - are you just trolling me? You can't possibly believe any of this. Please tell me you really believe what you write.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-51018212899218437382007-10-09T20:32:00.000-06:002007-10-09T20:32:00.000-06:00Hey 2:55 pm - shame on you! Boncella, Gordon, and...Hey 2:55 pm - shame on you! Boncella, Gordon, and Runde are some of C-Division's most prominent and visible TSMs. These guys bring in numerous PDs and have huge publication records. Without them, the Lab would be nothing. They should be Lab fellows!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-34776407252449281182007-10-09T14:55:00.000-06:002007-10-09T14:55:00.000-06:00Thanks for the dialog. You have been worth a barre...Thanks for the dialog. You have been worth a barrel of laughs, which I shall always fondly remember. <BR/><BR/>Some of the highlights are<BR/>> your contention that Boncella, Gordon, and Runde should be lab fellows,<BR/>> your contention that a metal-dihydrogen complex would save the world (or at least your group’s budget) for fuel cells,<BR/>> your contention that an unreviewed PNAS paper is worth more than Carolyn Bertozzi’s or Angela Belcher’s corpus of work,<BR/>> your belief that anyone who disagrees with you is not a scientist.<BR/><BR/>I look forward to hearing your lunatic voice again on another thread.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-78430770025363622602007-10-09T00:56:00.000-06:002007-10-09T00:56:00.000-06:00"11:36 PM ... "By the way I know the good chemists..."11:36 PM ... "By the way I know the good chemists at the lab and none of them would say the things you are saying."<BR/><BR/>Uhh, yes they would.<BR/><BR/>10/8/07 9:04 PM<BR/><BR/>Yaa right. Sorry there is no way in hell you work in LANL or that you are even a scientist. Sign your name. I do work at Los Alamos and I am a scientist so I do not want outside people to think that you have anything to do with LANL.<BR/><BR/>As I said before I do know the good chemists at the lab and what you have said is a complete insult to them and you should be ashamed. They are good people and they would never say these things. Do not put words into their mouths. If you stand by your statments than sign your name.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-90463558057590500522007-10-08T21:04:00.000-06:002007-10-08T21:04:00.000-06:0011:36 PM ... "By the way I know the good chemists ...11:36 PM ... "By the way I know the good chemists at the lab and none of them would say the things you are saying."<BR/><BR/>Uhh, yes they would.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-76577656802459456582007-10-08T08:39:00.000-06:002007-10-08T08:39:00.000-06:0010:22 and 10:32 are the same person. That is why I...10:22 and 10:32 are the same person. That is why I said "PS" in the 10:32 post.<BR/><BR/>So the "good chemists at the lab" would say that the one PNAS paper is better than the sum of Bertozzi's work? That speaks more about the "good chemists at the lab" than it does about MHH.<BR/><BR/>And how is asking about what happened "viscous (sic) and disgusting"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-16482732067308761162007-10-07T23:36:00.000-06:002007-10-07T23:36:00.000-06:0010:22pm10:30pm10:32pmI guess you are all the same ...10:22pm<BR/>10:30pm<BR/>10:32pm<BR/><BR/>I guess you are all the same poster. God I hope you do not work at Los Alamos. Do you realize how embarrassing you make <BR/>LANL look? Somebody does some great work at Los Alamos and wins a tremedously prestegious prize and you make your viscous and disgusting comments. <BR/><BR/>Again what have you ever done that was so great? By the way I know the good chemists at the lab and none of them would say the things you are saying. So you are some low life troll or just really delusional.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-10093503922736897712007-10-07T22:32:00.000-06:002007-10-07T22:32:00.000-06:00PS:"As I said I know the work of these people bett...PS:<BR/><BR/>"As I said I know the work of these people better than you."<BR/><BR/>No, you don't.<BR/><BR/>(nanny, nanny, boo-boo) <BR/><BR/>;PAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-86093490443270946092007-10-07T22:30:00.000-06:002007-10-07T22:30:00.000-06:00All MHH has is one PNAS, which was never peer-revi...All MHH has is one PNAS, which was never peer-reviewed. Reminds me of the cold-fusion days. Nuff said. It sounds like 9:31 pm is from a Celine Dion skit on SNL, "I'm the greatest chemist (singer) in the world!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-83708647321768296242007-10-07T22:22:00.000-06:002007-10-07T22:22:00.000-06:00If "usefull (sic) and will actually have an impact...If "usefull (sic) and will actually have an impact" is your criterion, then I would have to nominate Nicholas Terrett.<BR/><BR/>Or maybe Margaret Thatcher (yes, that Margaret Thatcher), who made a more lasting contribution to chemistry than MHH (hint: look up Mr Whippy).<BR/><BR/>I don't think either Terrett or Thatcher needed a sugar daddy to submit their papers for them in PNAS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-12999483932430833402007-10-07T21:31:00.000-06:002007-10-07T21:31:00.000-06:00"Watch out for the new drug tests, 7:28, since you..."Watch out for the new drug tests, 7:28, since you are clearly stoned right now.<BR/><BR/>You would seriously put a new explosive chemical on the same level as DNA-based electrical conduction (Barton), soft matter templating of minerals to imitate sea-creatures (Belcher), cell communication (Bertozzi), and conducting polymers before anyone else had a clue (Wrighton). <BR/><BR/>If she didn't have a made-for-TV-movie story, MHH would not get a second look from anyone.<BR/><BR/>10/6/07 8:15 PM"<BR/><BR/>I am glad you can look up people on google. As I said I know the work of these people better than you. What MHH already did is way more important than anything these other people did. Come on Angela Belcher? That stuff is cute but that is it. Also conducting polymers sorry thats Heeger. Barton? A ton of better people have worked on conduction in DNA, and it is still useless. You really do not get it? She made something that will be usefull and <BR/>will actually have an impact. <BR/><BR/>I do not mean to be blunt but you<BR/>really are not very knowledgeable<BR/>of science or how it works. You just sound like a worthless jealous piece of. What have you ever done for the lab or for science? Lets have a name if you are so great.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-27362894823678933952007-10-07T10:49:00.000-06:002007-10-07T10:49:00.000-06:0010/6/07 8:16 PM, careful what you ask for. I'm wil...10/6/07 8:16 PM, careful what you ask for. I'm willing to bet Tom Meyer is penning her ACS award nomination as we speak.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-65759142935270148792007-10-06T20:16:00.000-06:002007-10-06T20:16:00.000-06:00And you - 7:28 PM - sound like a MHH to me. Why d...And you - 7:28 PM - sound like a MHH to me. Why don't you get elected to the NAS or even the AAAS or try to get an ACS award and then we will talk.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-41333453845305260232007-10-06T20:15:00.000-06:002007-10-06T20:15:00.000-06:00Watch out for the new drug tests, 7:28, since you ...Watch out for the new drug tests, 7:28, since you are clearly stoned right now.<BR/><BR/>You would seriously put a new explosive chemical on the same level as DNA-based electrical conduction (Barton), soft matter templating of minerals to imitate sea-creatures (Belcher), cell communication (Bertozzi), and conducting polymers before anyone else had a clue (Wrighton). <BR/><BR/>If she didn't have a made-for-TV-movie story, MHH would not get a second look from anyone.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-62720638152646593542007-10-06T19:28:00.000-06:002007-10-06T19:28:00.000-06:00"I know Barton, Belcher, Bertozzi, Kiessling, Lee,..."<BR/>I know Barton, Belcher, Bertozzi, Kiessling, Lee, Rosenzweig, and Wrighton. My Hang Huynh is NO Barton, Belcher, Bertozzi, Kiessling, Lee, Rosenzweig, or Wrighton.<BR/><BR/>10/5/07 9:45 PM"<BR/><BR/>Well I know these people too and can tell you right now My Hang Huynh is as good or better than these people. I do not know who you are but you have no idea what you are talking about. Also I bet you do not know these people or any other chemists. You sound like a troll to me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-21170280421405807672007-10-06T11:26:00.000-06:002007-10-06T11:26:00.000-06:0010:33 AM - and that is why the Lab will make her a...10:33 AM - and that is why the Lab will make her a Senior Lab Fellow, just like Press, Sattleberger, and Younger. It is the only trophy (aside from the Nobel prize) that she has been after and has not received from the Lab ... yet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-46411549142693285172007-10-06T10:33:00.000-06:002007-10-06T10:33:00.000-06:00MHH does not have a case against LANL. That is why...MHH does not have a case against LANL. That is why organizations like LANL like kicking people upstairs, putting them on disability, etc. How can someone be harmed when they continue to make their salary?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-11367989242975195132007-10-06T09:46:00.000-06:002007-10-06T09:46:00.000-06:008:44 AM:LANL got rid of an unstable troublemaker.W...8:44 AM:<BR/><BR/>LANL got rid of an unstable troublemaker.<BR/><BR/>What consistutes a "troublemaker"? I would like a definition since I would guess any "troublemakers" are the first on the RIF chopping block. I hope MHH sues and wins and is the first of many huge lawsuits against the Lab during the RIF-age.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28220200.post-67880998252512786452007-10-06T08:44:00.000-06:002007-10-06T08:44:00.000-06:00LANL got rid of an unstable troublemaker.MHH gets ...LANL got rid of an unstable troublemaker.<BR/><BR/>MHH gets paid a good salary on disability.<BR/><BR/>Sounds like win-win!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com