Aug 18, 2007

Domenici fights for VLBA

CAROL A. CLARK Monitor County Editor

Critical of early FY2009 budget plans for cutting radio astronomy, Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., recently wrote a letter to National Science Foundation (NSF) Director Arden Bement. Domenici was sharply critical of preliminary budget instructions that would severely constrain funds for the National Astronomy Radio Observatories (NRAO), which oversees the operation of U.S. radio astronomy facilities like the the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) and Very Large Array (VLA), headquartered in an NRAO facility on the New Mexico Tech campus in Socorro.

Domenici issued a news release stating a tentative budget proposal that would result in the closure of the VLBA in New Mexico makes little sense in light of congressional efforts to double NSF funding in the near future.

The VLBA is a system of 10 radio telescopes controlled remotely from the Array Operations Center in Socorro that work together as the world's largest dedicated, full-time astronomical instrument. The massive white satellite dish that can be seen near Bandelier is part of the VLBA.

Under guidelines submitted by NSF for approval by the White House Office of Management and Budget, the NRAO would be forced to implement personnel layoffs in FY2008 and close the VLBA and Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia in 2010.

"It has recently come to my attention that the National Science Foundation continues to push forward to constrain the operations of its astronomy facilities with guidance that most certainly anticipates the closure of some of our world-class U.S. radio astronomy facilities," Domenici wrote Bement. "It makes no sense to me that the agency would proceed with an internal budgeting exercise that risks future U.S. leadership in radio astronomy, and moreover the closure of at least two of our premier U.S. facilities, at a time when the future looks very bright for the NSF."

NRAO Public Information Officer Dave Finley explained Thursday that the NRAO facility on the New Mexico Tech campus supports both the VLBA and the VLA.

"We consider all 10 dishes in the VLBA to be one instrument and all 27 dishes in the VLA to be one instrument," Finley said. "If the VLBA were to close, it would definitely include the Los Alamos dish."

The Los Alamos dish is located on a fenced-in area of land on Los Alamos National Laboratory property at TA-33. The NRAO leases the land from LANL.

To keep its competitive edge globally, and to continue to innovate in science and technology, Domenici stated in the letter, the U.S. needs its world-class facilities, such as the VLA and the VLBA.

"Without exception, both facilities carry out cutting-edge research in radio astronomy that is not duplicated elsewhere in the world," he said.

Domenici, who serves on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee that funds the NSF, pointed out to Bement that the America COMPETES Act, which President George W. Bush is expected to sign into law this week, includes a provision to more than double NSF funding over the next five to 10 years.

Domenici asked to meet with Bement to discuss the NSF and NRAO budget outlook.

The Senate Appropriations Committee, has approved the FY2008 Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Bill that increases funding for NSF next year, providing $6.55 billion. This funding level is $125 million over the budget request and $636 million above the FY2007 funding level. The bill fully funds Bush's American Competitiveness Initiative and increases the NSF budget by more than 7 percent.

Finley said NRAO management has been talking with the NSF about the possible cuts. A committee has made some recommendations and Finley said they're hopeful some solutions can be reached.

20 comments:

  1. VLBA

    What a waste of the taxpayers money.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Worse than LDRD, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 3:50 I agree both a waste. Hell NSF and NIH re also a waste of the taxpayers dollar.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I say it's time to take care of the problems we have on earth and therefore all space exploration programs should be cut 100% this year and never return. Hell, we can't even manage our resources here, why should be worry about what is out there. Cut the prgrams now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hold yer horses there. We need those big telescopes - only something that big and powerful could find a clue in most of the comments on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A sigmoidoscope works in some cases.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Perhaps 7:51's missing clues can be found in poorly contained classified emails.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 8:19pm: An example of the clue-free comments that abound on here.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Alright some real thinking on the blog. Why do we have NASA? What a waste of the taxpayers money. Do you think tang is worth 300b? Welfare for Florida and Texas. Shut it down now for Gods sake.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Everyone knows all of societies ills can be solved by throwing money at them. Get with it people.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I bow to your superior clued-in-ness, 8:41.

    How about enlightening us with something insightful?

    Pretty please?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Welfare for FL and TX, therefore shut it down? This, on the blog all about the "rest of the story" for the institution serving an equivalent welfare role for northern NM? Puh-leeze.

    ReplyDelete
  13. What the hell are we doing wasting money on science?! We need more and better weapons! We need the RRW program fully funded, along with the Complex 2030 boondoggle that will provide me job security until I retire filthy rich. Come on Pete, get your priorities in order old man! Can you say two words--Campaign Contributions?

    ReplyDelete
  14. 11:12pm

    Indeed!! Los Almaos, LLNL, Oak Ridge, NASA, NSF and NIH are wellfare for various states. Shut them all down now! Mechels is right on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  15. We will need both NASA if the big one comes our way and we need to nuke it.

    Why do we need so many national labs ? I don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 2:44pm

    What if the core of the earth stops? We will need nukes than.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "What if the core of the earth stops? We will need nukes than."

    Worst... movie... ever.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Worse than your average Ed Wood movie? I must've missed something - what movie has the core of the earth doing something bad as it's plot? That sounds like a hoot.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 12:12

    "The Core" It is so bad that it is kind of fun.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Core rules! One of my all time favorite crappy movies, after Deep Blue Sea.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.