Sep 5, 2007

Air Force probes mistaken transport of nuclear warheads

From Barbara Starr, CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Six nuclear warheads on cruise missiles were mistakenly carried on a flight from North Dakota to Louisiana last week, prompting a major investigation, military officials have confirmed.

(A B-52 is seen on the ground at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, in this file photo.)

The plane took the cruise missiles from Minot Air Force Base to Barksdale Air Force Base for decommissioning Thursday, the Air Force said.

"This is a major gaffe, and it's going to cause some heads to roll down the line," said Don Shepperd, a retired Air Force major general and military analyst for CNN.

The warheads should have been removed from the missiles before they were attached to the B-52 bomber, according to military officials.

The crew was unaware that the plane was carrying nuclear weapons, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the extraordinary sensitivity and security surrounding the case.

The mistake was discovered after the plane's flight to Louisiana.

Minot Air Force Base is in north central North Dakota and Barksdale Air Force Base is in northwest Louisiana near the Texas border.

Lt. Col. Ed Thomas said that while the military does not publicly discuss nuclear weapons procedures, in this case the Air Force decided to acknowledge the incident in order to reassure the public.

"The public was never in any danger," Thomas said.

But officials also said the incident was a major breach of security rules surrounding nuclear weapons. One Air Force official said that he could not recall anything similar happening.

The Air Force announced that all flights of fighters and bombers in the United States will be halted on September 14 to allow for a review of procedures.

Because the incident involved nuclear weapons, it was serious enough that President Bush was notified, according to military officials. Once the mistake was discovered, the Air Force immediately began an inventory of all of its nuclear weapons, a military official said.

Maj. Gen. Douglas Raaberg, director of Air and Space Operations at the Air Combat Command in Langley, Virginia, has been ordered to investigate how the nuclear-tipped missiles were flown across the country without anyone knowing, officials said.

One officer already has been relieved of duty, and several others "decertified" from handling nuclear weapons, officials said.

A military official told CNN there was no nuclear risk to public safety because the weapons were not armed. Officials believe that if the plane had crashed or the missiles somehow had fallen off the wings, the warheads would have remained inert and there would have been no nuclear detonation, though conventional explosive material in the warhead could have detonated.

Military officials also say the missiles could not have been launched because of multiple security procedures required to be enacted before any launch would have been authorized.

Shepperd said the U.S. had agreed in a Cold War-era treaty not to fly nuclear weapons. "It appears that what happened was this treaty agreement was violated," he said.

He agreed with military officials that the situation could not have caused a nuclear detonation, but added, "Any time you have nuclear material on board, if the airplane crashes, nuclear material can be spread in the immediate area of the crash, so you get radioactivity in the immediate area of the crash."

"This is serious business but it was not dangerous business," Shepperd said.

The story was first reported by the Army Times, a privately published newspaper.

[This was sent in by a reader who asks, "Can you imagine if this had happened at a DOE facility?" Also worth noting, USA Today places the count at five, not six, W80-1's.]

10 comments:

  1. Close the Air Force down!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Send in Nanos. He'll get the fly boys ship shape.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We all know how this stuff flows downhill. For you Security & Safeguards pukes get ready for a bunch of new inspections, reviews, and lessons learned exercises.

    If you're a DOD puke involved in this incident it might be a good day to start smoking & drinking (if you haven't already started)...wait, wait! I think I just discovered the root cause of this event :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds like a good ARG event. send in the shock troops!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lt. Col. Ed Thomas said that while the military does not publicly discuss nuclear weapons procedures, in this case the Air Force decided to acknowledge the incident in order to reassure the public. "The public was never in any danger," Thomas said.

    Meanwhile, in the executive wing at LANL:
    "Quick...get public affairs to hire this Thomas guy! It's Kevin Roark's minny-me, and we got to get him here. What a spinster! Just the kind of guy we need on our team."

    --Richard of LANS making this observation before Emperor Anistasio and his court

    ReplyDelete
  6. We can't keep track of our own WMDs and yet we think we can find the ones claimed to exist in Iraq?

    ReplyDelete
  7. A historic reference: http://www.brookings.edu/fp/projects/nucwcost/box7_3.htm

    ReplyDelete
  8. I woke up from my long-summer's snooze when I saw this article in the paper... I posted my own blog entry before I saw this one. I should have known that Pinky and Gussie and all your fine readers were on top of things...

    But did you notice the betwixt of Anastasio and Zozobra?

    - Doc

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.