Clark on “Breakfast with Nancy” today
On KTAO radioDavid Clark of Stockpile Manufacturing and Support (ADSMS) will appear on the KTAO radio program "Breakfast With Nancy," on Thursday [14 August 2008].
KTAO radio personality Nancy Stapp hosts the show. The Los Alamos portion of the show begins at 9:15 a.m.
Clark is the head of the Seaborg Institute for Actinide Science and part of Los Alamos's Stockpile Manufacturing team. A prominent plutonium scientist who was instrumental in developing the highly successful science-based cleanup plan for the Rocky Flats plant, Clark is an authority on plutonium, other radioactive materials, and environmental remediation.
Along with Clark will be Kevin Roark of the Laboratory's Communications Office.
KTAO can be heard at 101.9 FM and online following the links.
[Download an mp3 of the show here.]
Nice to see that Clark is accompanied by a handler so he does not get off message.
ReplyDeleteThe important people that LANL's PR staff should be spending their precious time wining over aren't in the small town of Taos. They're in Washington DC, and in that town LANL track record at winning new friends is very poor.
ReplyDeleteI heard about a contamination injury at LANL yesterday. Is there any truth to this rumor?
ReplyDeleteGermanium again?
ReplyDeleteYes, true but won't give details unless false information becomes splattered all over the blog.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous at 8/14/08 3:07 PM said...
ReplyDelete"Yes, true but won't give details unless false information becomes splattered all over the blog."
So, let me get this right:
If we say nothing or tell the truth,
you will say nothing.
If I lie, then you will speak the
truth!
Is this Mikey?
No, it ain't Mikey, just somebody who is in the know of what happened. Don't worry, info will come out soon enough.
ReplyDeleteMy, aren't we Dr. Cryptic.
ReplyDeleteIt happened in CLES - Neu is covering it up. Jobs are on the line.
ReplyDeleteNo, it didn't happen in CLES! Try Ta-55.
ReplyDeleteWhy is this incident such a secret on this blog?
ReplyDeleteBecause nobody on this blog knows anything, and they're afraid to make stuff up because if anything significant did actually happen, the truth will come out eventually.
ReplyDeleteAs a taxpayer, aren't we entitled to know what happened at TA-55?
ReplyDeleteAnd, I think that the employees and future employees are also entitled to know about safety incidents.
ReplyDeleteOkay all you blog whiners. A machinist, who works for pit man, received a glove puncture while cutting apart a "part." He was wearing leather gloves over his GB gloves. His wound was contaminated, excised and now undergoing chelation. His uptake was small in the relative sense.
ReplyDeleteOK! Thanks for the info.
ReplyDeleteWas that really so hard?
Not to veer on-topic here, but I listened to the replay of Clark's radio interview and I thought he did a stellar job.
ReplyDeleteRoark, on the other hand, objected to nukes being referred to as "offensive" weapons and insisted they are defensive.
Huh?
The US has no "first strike" strategy for using nuclear weapons. Thus, they can accurately be categorized as a defensive weapon.
ReplyDeleteOf course, if Bush got his way and the US had developed a small nuke "bunker-buster", all that might have quickly changed. I'm eagerly counting the days until this man leaves his office.
First strike is not the same as first use. There is not a no first use policy. Therefore, they can be characterized as offensive.
ReplyDelete