Jul 8, 2007

Inquiring minds want to know

Sent in by a reader of clearly indiscriminate good taste. Any substance to this suggested event?


Oh great guru - regarding non reported security-events?

Is it true that a secretary at the lab was arrested on the 5th as part of a theft ring? Is it also true that she (a woman) had stolen her boss's laptop? Is it also true it held classified? (Surely there will be an attempt to downplay level of classification.) Which makes one wonder what is the point of having classification levels if some aren't as important as others.

Oh great sage - did this really happen? Is it the new LANS approach to getting no one to care to have an event a day so that the world stops paying attention? Very clever! Very clever indeed. (Was this a Mitchell reccomendation as they led him out?)


Anonymous said...

If true, the only thing that would make this worse is if she stole the laptop in Ireland and it had no classified on it when she stole it.

Anonymous said...

Another obvious case of "human error". Nothing to see here, people. Move along.

Anonymous said...

LANS is getting better at cover-up. First they get Sam Bodman to downgrade the LANS board member classified emailing fubar to "human error". They seem to be making other incidents just go away. It must be good to be Bechtel.