Dec 14, 2007

Documents track lab's security record

Los Alamos Monitor

By ROGER SNODGRASS, Monitor Assistant Editor

A principal nemesis of Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), released electronic copies of a series of slide presentations made by lab managers on Sept. 17 to the Department of Energy.

The unclassified slides were marked “official use only” and “May be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act.”

Of special interest in POGO’s revelation Tuesday were a pair of slides on security incidents at the laboratory from June 2006 through June 2007, which counted 13 top-level security breaches during that period.

The text of the slide indicated that seven of the 13 incidents involved people who checked their own work for classification.

“POGO is once again making an assertion that is at best inaccurate and at worst misleading,” said LANL spokesperson Kevin Roark. “They characterize this one data point as a debacle, which it isn’t.”

He said the lab’s track record graphed on another slide showed that the numbers are trending better.

“They showed security improvement, particularly if you go back to ‘04 and ‘05,” he said. “There is a marked improvement over ‘06.”

POGO’s press release highlighted one of the bullet points in the presentation:

“These incidents cause doubt in our ability to protect national secrets, potentially cost millions in fines, and bring in additional external oversight (35 external audits and reviews for physical security since June 2006),” the slide stated.

“They took that line and interpret it in the worst possible way,” Roark said.

He said what the presenter meant was that the most important thing is preventing the incidents, which in turn reduces the doubts of overseers and regulators in your ability to do it.

“We don’t want people to think all we care about is what people think of us,” he added. “What we really care about is preventing these incidents.”

An update for July and August, indicated that there were “34 Security Incidents and 102 Sub-Reportable Events.” A partial breakdown down was given, as follows:

• 43 Improperly Secured Items
• 32 Incidents (of) Portable Electronic Devices in security areas
• 19 Potential Unauthorized Disclosures (Majority e-mail related)

Roark said that while the trends are good, “We want to be at zero.”

He said the 12-month average had dropped from 1.83 top-level security incidents a month in November 2006, to .58 incidents in November 2007.

POGO also got in a jab about a slide titled “Security Improvements,” which shows a guard in a checkpoint giving “standard” stop and go signals.

“Can you believe one of the new security measures touted in the presentation was the use of stop and go hand signals for guards posted at vehicle entrances?” Danielle Brian Executive Director of POGO in the press release. “It hurts too much to laugh.”

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nemesis? That's glorifying it a bit.

How about pesky swarm of malarial mosquitos.

Anonymous said...

POGO also got in a jab about a slide titled “Security Improvements,” which shows a guard in a checkpoint giving “standard” stop and go signals.

“Can you believe one of the new security measures touted in the presentation was the use of stop and go hand signals for guards posted at vehicle entrances?” Danielle Brian Executive Director of POGO in the press release. “It hurts too much to laugh.”


POGO's got this one right. What a farce. And a waste of money.

Anonymous said...

If anyone with half a brain would help with these presentations and the plans for LANL's future in general, it might improve the 'impression potential' even if the presentation wasn't intended to be publically available.

I mean, how pitiful does LANL look to the rest of the world if the most memorable things that show up are that a) LANS spends most of its time discussing ways to spin bad news and b) they take low-level, no-brainer improvements and use them as window dressing in an attempt to show verifiable changes that are supposed to impress.

Frankly, the workforce has every reason to be embarrassed by many events, incidents of the last decade or so as well as management responses or actions. Historically people might have publically expressed their embarrassment and frustration but they are a little occupied worrying over the possibility of being on the losing end of a RIF action because they are not just 'invested' in this region but many, if not most, are in hock up to their furrowed brows.